Presidential Debates
 

Who won the 1st debate?

Hillary by a long shot. The amount of lies Trump told was just hilarious, how people can even consider voting for him is a mystery to me.

Anyone who voted Trump is just a Trump supporter. Trump was always defensive, interrupting Hillary Clinton too much, and never attacked her on Benghazi, the emails (didn't go in-depth), or her foundation. I don't think Clinton's win was a very big win. That debate was pretty unsubstantial in my opinion. However, she did clearly win that debate. It's also not helping that Trump is already making excuses instead of pushing that he won the debate.

she lies a lot too, it's just that Trump's are usually about himself and easily catchable, while Clinton's are not.

Hillary is by far a perfect candidate, actually she's pretty damn awful. But in my opinion she is the lesser of two evils.

Trump definitely lies a lot more though, this website is pretty useful:

http://www.politifact.com/personalities/donald-trump/

http://www.politifact.com/personalit...llary-clinton/

Pretty sure the debate won't sway many judgments wasn't a huge win if any for Hillary and a lot of people already have formed opinions lol.

Trump was doing well the first 40 minutes of the debate. The moderator was such a pro-Hillary biased puppet (who didn't asked HC about the emails, her support for war, Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation etc). Quite clear that it was a 2:1 and Trump still corrected Holt and held his own.

#TRUMP2016

That "pro-Hillary biased puppet" is a registered Republican.

Does holding his own include just denying anything stupid that he's said in the past when there's clear proof of him saying it? An example being saying he never claimed that climate change was a Chinese hoax yet there's 50+ tweets of him saying it is.

It was clear that it was 2 vs 1 in that debate. Majority of the population and world can see Holt has his head far up Clinton's ass. How the hell as a "unbiased" 'moderator', you ain't mentioned AT ALL about Clinton's skeletons in the closet yet spent majority of the time on Trump's birth conspiracy and tax returns. The first half of the debate was good (the main and important questions were asked). The second half was just straight nonsense on both ends but it's clear Holt was swinging to the left.

Of course he didn't ask about all that stuff, how long do you think he had? Yes Holt asked Trump about his tax returns but he also asked about Hillary's emails to balance it out. He only mentioned the birther movement due to it's links with race which he also asked Hillary about. He then flat out lied about not starting it, when he clearly did.

Read this: http://qz.com/793034/debate-2016-wha...-first-debate/

I'm not arguing what he is or anything like that, but just because he's a registered Republican doesn't mean he's not supporting Hillary Clinton.

Hillary is a misleading maggot and Trump is a lying lumper

What a ****ing ****-show.

how the **** was that a presidential debate

I don't care if you're a Trump supporter, surely those who voted for him in this poll do not actually believe he won that debate?

american politics-my favorite reality tv show

Hillary clinton I guess would be a better choice because trump is like the hitler and hillary clinton is like the Steven Harper of the debate
sure Harper was bad and was killing the country but he didn't want to kill an entire race,ethnic group or religion because he needed someone to blame.
Trump is a smart man but letting him be the one to represent the US would be a mistake.