Better Ban rule?
 

Okay so I've been noticed recently people have been getting banned and for all the wrong reasons (e.g. being in same room as hackers) I think that if you were to ban someone you should show proof like pic or video so if the person appeals you can show the proof. This would make less appeals i'm sure and if people do appeal and you have solid proof they are are fibbing so you can increase their ban.

I know a list of people that have been or currently are banned for literally no reason and appeals go through and they get declined.

I think this system is flawed and what I suggested seems a fairer thing.

There was a post made recently about this. You can post your ideas here.