Graalians

Graalians (https://www.graalians.com/forums/index.php)
-   GraalOnline Era (https://www.graalians.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   No more RL Pic allowed (https://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=20726)

imSupah 08-11-2013 04:23 PM

No more RL Pic allowed
 
1 Attachment(s)
Attachment 12698
It's now been confirmed that Real-Life Pictures are on the blacklist of gang pictures upload. It's for the security of the players. What do you think about this?

lord greg 08-11-2013 04:43 PM

Quote:

Posted by iAmSupah (Post 398675)
Attachment 12698
It's now been confirmed that Real-Life Pictures are on the blacklist of gang pictures upload. It's for the security of the players. What do you think about this?

Lets be honest it isn't for security of the players, there must have been some incident to trigger this.

imSupah 08-11-2013 04:52 PM

Quote:

Posted by lord greg (Post 398677)
Lets be honest it isn't for security of the players, there must have been some incident to trigger this.

Yea, I believe some incident happened as if it was for "the security of the players", they would have banned it long ago.

lord greg 08-11-2013 05:13 PM

Quote:

Posted by iAmSupah (Post 398678)
Yea, I believe some incident happened as if it was for "the security of the players", they would have banned it long ago.

Exactly and they would have consulted us first like when they introduced the gang pictures needed checking.

Wahzaah 08-11-2013 05:25 PM

It is, in fact, for the security of the players. It's not good to have real life images in a game like this. We all know about the "Rate gp, I'm 13, I need bf, my kik is blabla"-girls at start. The internet is a dangerous place for teenagers/kids like these.

I hope you understand what I'm trying to explain.

XSTARX 08-11-2013 05:37 PM

Quote:

Posted by Wahzaah (Post 398682)
It is, in fact, for the security of the players. It's not good to have real life images in a game like this. We all know about the "Rate gp, I'm 13, I need bf, my kik is blabla"-girls at start. The internet is a dangerous place for teenagers/kids like these.

I hope you understand what I'm trying to explain.

True dat.
Most players are young so it's inappropriate to show a real life pic of themselves.
Attracting more kids like a ********* ugh.

Sup3rn00b 08-11-2013 05:54 PM

Does this apply to any picture from real life or simply pictures that include people in them?

Breezy 08-11-2013 05:56 PM

This needed to happen one day I was looking at guild pics and saw a guys ***** it was scary I was also 10 years old at the time

Wahzaah 08-11-2013 06:03 PM

Quote:

Posted by Sup3rn00b (Post 398693)
Does this apply to any picture from real life or simply pictures that include people in them?

Only pictures with people in them will get rejected. Pictures with animals, vehicles,... are still getting accepted!

Talon 08-11-2013 06:27 PM

Quote:

Posted by Sup3rn00b (Post 398693)
Does this apply to any picture from real life or simply pictures that include people in them?

lolol

PerfectDark 08-11-2013 06:43 PM

I think it is a good idea. The real-life images have been blacklisted from zone for about 4 months now. Having the option of allowing players to upload pictures of themselves is not teaching them any lessons in keeping their personal stuff confidential.

lord greg 08-11-2013 06:45 PM

Quote:

Posted by Wahzaah (Post 398682)
It is, in fact, for the security of the players. It's not good to have real life images in a game like this. We all know about the "Rate gp, I'm 13, I need bf, my kik is blabla"-girls at start. The internet is a dangerous place for teenagers/kids like these.

I hope you understand what I'm trying to explain.

I do but why the sudden change? Surely it should have been sorted ages ago.

The Doctor 08-11-2013 07:17 PM

I remember talking to Stefan on RC. He noted that there is some US law regarding minors posting images of themselves (under 13 I think) without parental consent. This makes sense actually because Facebook has the same procedure (I believe)

Era News 08-11-2013 09:56 PM

Easiest way around this would be just to have to tick a box saying your over 13 before you can upload the picture.

Yog 08-11-2013 09:58 PM

Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 398761)
Easiest way around this would be just to have to tick a box saying your over 13 before you can upload the picture.

Like that would work.

These are Gang Logos. Not Graal Profiles. There is no reason to be sharing your pictures on Graal period.

5hift 08-11-2013 11:03 PM

Quote:

Posted by Wahzaah (Post 398682)
It is, in fact, for the security of the players. It's not good to have real life images in a game like this. We all know about the "Rate gp, I'm 13, I need bf, my kik is blabla"-girls at start. The internet is a dangerous place for teenagers/kids like these.

I hope you understand what I'm trying to explain.

People who actually do that are pretty much asking for trouble...

iDigzy 08-12-2013 02:42 AM

Does this mean pictures of famous people, such as musicians, sports players etc will also be rejected?

MrSimons 08-12-2013 05:31 AM

Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 398761)
Easiest way around this would be just to have to tick a box saying your over 13 before you can upload the picture.

that would do absolutely nothing.

PumaD 08-12-2013 05:49 AM

Quote:

Posted by iDigzy (Post 398832)
Does this mean pictures of famous people, such as musicians, sports players etc will also be rejected?

I believe so because (this is a weird examppe but the only legit reason in my mind) you don't know if it's the famous guy uploading a picture of himself. Means if yes, he would be allowed to upload reallife pictures, while other's are not.

Rexx 08-12-2013 06:08 AM

Quote:

Posted by The Doctor (Post 398724)
I remember talking to Stefan on RC. He noted that there is some US law regarding minors posting images of themselves (under 13 I think) without parental consent. This makes sense actually because Facebook has the same procedure (I believe)

I'm calling bull**** on this made up "law"
Stefan doesn't know what he's talking about. He's French for christsake.


I can understand reason for blanket banning all irl pics.
Someone can easily upload a picture of someone else without their consent that doesn't want their picture uploaded. That's the only legit reason, that and n00dz of course.

Ash Ketchum 08-12-2013 12:59 PM

copyright iClassic

Ryan 08-12-2013 01:00 PM

umad?

Ivy 08-12-2013 05:18 PM

Stefan is German

The Doctor 08-12-2013 05:56 PM

Quote:

Posted by Rexx (Post 398867)
I'm calling bull**** on this made up "law"
Stefan doesn't know what he's talking about. He's French for christsake.


I can understand reason for blanket banning all irl pics.
Someone can easily upload a picture of someone else without their consent that doesn't want their picture uploaded. That's the only legit reason, that and n00dz of course.

http://business.ftc.gov/documents/Co...sked-Questions

I haven't read this but I believe this has the answer for you.

Quote:

Yes. The amended Rule considers photos, videos, and audio recordings that contain a child’s image or voice to be personal information. This means that operators covered by COPPA must either (i) prescreen and delete from children’s submissions any photos, videos, or audio recordings of themselves or other children or (ii), first give parents notice and obtain their consent prior to permitting children to upload any photos, videos, or audio recordings of themselves or other children.

Ivy 08-12-2013 06:06 PM

Lmao

iDigzy 08-12-2013 06:37 PM

Quote:

Posted by The Doctor (Post 398989)

http://business.ftc.gov/documents/Co...sked-Questions

I haven't read this but I believe this has the answer for you.

So, this only applies to children, uploading pictures of of real life people would not be against the law anyways, for example sports players, musicians, famous people etc. All that would be needed was a checkmark saying you are 18+ or whatever it is lol...

Ghettoicedtea 08-12-2013 09:06 PM

Secruity to players? So i cant put up a picture of my dog running around with my sisters cat on his back?

I blame classic and those stupid rate me guyz people for this whole uploading and approving crap since they were uploading porn or somewhat to porn and what not.

Yog 08-12-2013 09:15 PM

Quote:

Posted by Ghettoicedtea (Post 399032)
I blame classic and those stupid rate me guyz people for this whole uploading and approving crap since they were uploading porn or somewhat to porn and what not.

Yeah, only Classic did this. Era had no part.

Even though this is not the reason for the new rule

Ghettoicedtea 08-12-2013 09:19 PM

Quote:

Posted by Yogurt (Post 399041)
Yeah, only Classic did this. Era had no part.

Even though this is not the reason for the new rule

I never said only classic, i did also say and those stupid kids with that plz rate me guyz. Thats era too. But the whole approval thing i beleve was because classic was uploading porn and child porn.

Yog 08-12-2013 09:23 PM

Quote:

Posted by Ghettoicedtea (Post 399053)
I never said only classic, i did also say and those stupid kids with that plz rate me guyz. Thats era too.

Well you only said Classic, and you are still only saying Classic.

Quote:

Posted by Ghettoicedtea (Post 399053)
But the whole approval thing i beleve was because classic was uploading porn and child porn.

No s***, Sherlock.

Oh, and there it is again. Classics fault. You do realize the Era community is much worse than Classic, right?

lord greg 08-12-2013 09:26 PM

Quote:

Posted by Yogurt (Post 399056)
Well you only said Classic, and you are still only saying Classic.



No s***, Sherlock.

Oh, and there it is again. Classics fault. You do realize the Era community is much worse than Classic, right?

I seriously doubt that.

Ivy 08-12-2013 09:40 PM

Quote:

Posted by lord greg (Post 399058)
I seriously doubt that.

LIES

iDigzy 08-12-2013 09:52 PM

Quote:

Posted by Yogurt (Post 399056)

Well you only said Classic, and you are still only saying Classic.

No s***, Sherlock.

Oh, and there it is again. Classics fault. You do realize the Era community is much worse than Classic, right?

Your kidding right? They had to block URL images from furniture because iClassic had "P0rn shops"...

Yog 08-12-2013 10:09 PM

Quote:

Posted by iDigzy (Post 399070)
Your kidding right? They had to block URL images from furniture because iClassic had "P0rn shops"...

...and they did. I'm not trying to say Classic never used profane images, I'm just saying you can't blame just Classic for this new rule. Infact, you can blame no one.

The Doctor 08-12-2013 10:33 PM

Quote:

Posted by Yogurt (Post 399079)
...and they did. I'm not trying to say Classic never used profane images, I'm just saying you can't blame just Classic for this new rule. Infact, you can blame no one.

except for obama

Ivy 08-12-2013 10:37 PM

Quote:

Posted by The Doctor (Post 399090)
except for obama's wife

She's cray cray

Yog 08-13-2013 12:36 AM

Quote:

Posted by The Doctor (Post 399090)
except for obama

Touche

Ash Ketchum 08-13-2013 12:43 AM

Lol classic has more teens going through puberty

Yog 08-13-2013 12:50 AM

Quote:

Posted by Ash Ketchum (Post 399138)
Lol classic has more teens going through puberty

They are man enough to play a real server now.

Ghettoicedtea 08-13-2013 01:52 AM

Quote:

Posted by Yogurt (Post 399056)
No s***, Sherlock.

Oh, and there it is again. Classics fault. You do realize the Era community is much worse than Classic, right?

i beg your pardon but were not the ones uploading child porn as gangpics.

Ivy 08-13-2013 01:55 AM

Quote:

Posted by Ghettoicedtea (Post 399155)
i beg your pardon but were not the ones uploading child porn as gangpics.

I beg your pardon but they are much worse child porn or not lmao. Rude and obnoxious swag fags

Ash Ketchum 08-13-2013 01:58 AM

Quote:

Posted by Shadowfox (Post 399158)
I beg your pardon but they are much worse child porn or not lmao. Rude and obnoxious swag fags

I pardon your beg

Ghettoicedtea 08-13-2013 01:59 AM

Quote:

Posted by Shadowfox (Post 399158)
I beg your pardon but they are much worse child porn or not lmao. Rude and obnoxious swag fags

I beg to differ as child pornography is illegal unlike swag fags who are just looked down upon.
Dont they also start up like a crap load of pointless riots in that one place thats like start in era?

Ivy 08-13-2013 02:05 AM

I would rather child porn then swag fags but that's my personal opinion

Ash Ketchum 08-13-2013 02:06 AM

Quote:

Posted by Shadowfox (Post 399167)
I would rather child porn then swag fags but that's my personal opinion

LOL WOW

Ivy 08-13-2013 02:08 AM

I take pleasure in people's unhappiness and go out of my way to cause it

Zero02 08-13-2013 02:16 AM

I can't stop laughing at this whole thread

Rexx 08-13-2013 02:25 AM

Quote:

Posted by Shadowfox (Post 399167)
I would rather child porn then swag fags but that's my personal opinion

The police will be arriving at your doorstep shortly.

Ghettoicedtea 08-13-2013 02:48 AM

Quote:

Posted by Shadowfox (Post 399167)
I would rather child porn then swag fags but that's my personal opinion

http://http://i3.kym-cdn.com/entries...5/pedobear.jpg
Ya here that? Here comes the police, congrats your now a official sex offender

Ivy 08-13-2013 02:53 AM

Hear what

I see a little white box on the screen. Is that supposed to intimidate me? Lmao


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.