Graalians

Graalians (https://www.graalians.com/forums/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Chat (https://www.graalians.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   World War 3? (https://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14871)

iHot 02-01-2013 02:14 AM

World War 3?
 
If this ever happens... what will happen?

Blueh 02-01-2013 02:35 AM

I believe it would most likely be something involving an Arab-Israeli conflict.

iHot 02-01-2013 02:37 AM

Quote:

Posted by Blueh (Post 290491)
I believe it would most likely be something involving an Arab-Israeli conflict.

I was thinking more along nucleur warfare.

Pimpsy G. 02-01-2013 02:38 AM

Well given the international nature of these forums, things would get really awkward.

Quote:

I was thinking more along nucleur warfare.
That conflict will probably be nuclear warfare.

Fury 02-01-2013 02:40 AM

If it happens its gonna be because of the Zionists

iHot 02-01-2013 02:40 AM

Quote:

Posted by Pimpsy G. (Post 290494)
Well given the international nature of these forums, things would get really awkward.



That conflict will probably be nuclear warfare.

Lol I'm Arab (Palestinian) and I have to admit the Arabs don't stand a chance against Israel.

MementoJoker 02-01-2013 08:15 AM

Quote:

Posted by iHot (Post 290496)
Lol I'm Arab (Palestinian) and I have to admit the Arabs don't stand a chance against Israel.

Iran does. Egypt does (if it gets out of the economical crisis).
That's not the point, I think it'll be East vs. West.

Rezon 02-01-2013 12:38 PM

Due to alliances, **** would just blow up.

Ignatius 02-01-2013 12:57 PM

1 Attachment(s)
If it happens, we're most likely all dead, so

Xenthic 02-01-2013 03:20 PM

It's all on religion, I think something like this is predicted in the bible :0

Rexx 02-01-2013 06:30 PM

I don't think their will be because it would most likely involve nukes.
The stakes would just be too high and it would fizzle out somehow...

Pimpsy G. 02-01-2013 06:56 PM

Quote:

Posted by Rexx (Post 290769)
I don't think their will be because it would most likely involve nukes.
The stakes would just be too high and it would fizzle out somehow...

Its pretty incredible, nukes are the first weapon weapon in history that are avoided from use in battlefields simply because they are too deadly.

Rexx 02-01-2013 07:30 PM

Right. The only reason we were able to nuke Japan in WW2 was because nobody else had nukes at the time. Now it's a whole different story.

Ignatius 02-01-2013 08:11 PM

yeah, dont forget north korea though. theyll just send out a fleet of unicorn suicide dynomite bombers to blow san francisco sky high.

Blueh 02-01-2013 08:43 PM

I think WWIII could start by the US losing power in the middle east (like it is now) and with it, power over oil reserves and pipelines. Debt increases, we are no longer able to pay for foreign goods in fear of continuing to harm the economy. Depression sets in. China steps in and uses this to vantage. They will not directly instigate war, rather slowly begin to gain influence in areas of the middle east and of pipelines previously used bt the US. Tensions between Zionists and radical Muslims increase. More battles, more turmoil. All of it builds up and then it happens. The most destructive, conservative and intelligent war that will bring the world to its knees.

Rexx 02-01-2013 08:54 PM

Quote:

Posted by Ignatius (Post 290824)
yeah, dont forget north korea though. theyll just send out a fleet of unicorn suicide dynomite bombers to blow san francisco sky high.

North Korea is too far away to be a serious threat. We would shoot down their nukes over the Pacific. The real threat is them attacking South Korea, our ally, which they are technically still at war with.

DragonRider 02-02-2013 03:56 AM

Quote:

Posted by Blueh (Post 290841)
I think WWIII could start by the US losing power in the middle east (like it is now) and with it, power over oil reserves and pipelines. Debt increases, we are no longer able to pay for foreign goods in fear of continuing to harm the economy. Depression sets in. China steps in and uses this to vantage. They will not directly instigate war, rather slowly begin to gain influence in areas of the middle east and of pipelines previously used bt the US. Tensions between Zionists and radical Muslims increase. More battles, more turmoil. All of it builds up and then it happens. The most destructive, conservative and intelligent war that will bring the world to its knees.

Remove this before the Chinese government sees this.

Pimpsy G. 02-02-2013 04:04 AM

Quote:

Posted by Blueh (Post 290841)
I think WWIII could start by the US losing power in the middle east (like it is now) and with it, power over oil reserves and pipelines. Debt increases, we are no longer able to pay for foreign goods in fear of continuing to harm the economy. Depression sets in. China steps in and uses this to vantage. They will not directly instigate war, rather slowly begin to gain influence in areas of the middle east and of pipelines previously used bt the US. Tensions between Zionists and radical Muslims increase. More battles, more turmoil. All of it builds up and then it happens. The most destructive, conservative and intelligent war that will bring the world to its knees.

I'm not so sure that this will happen considering that there are many other areas available to use oil outside of the middle east, its just the cheapest one with our current technology. Its more likely that we will develop some sort of alternative to oil, and then the middle east will collapse. Really the entire middle east is the equivalent of a massive "boom" town. Its recent rise is entirely due to the oil business, without that, it will fall apart.

Shock 02-02-2013 04:18 AM

WWIII : The Hi-Tech Religious War, fueled by economic dysfunction. I'm sure it'll be over something completely avoidable.

Some economic disaster will be blamed on a middle eastern country probably. Maybe over oil, resources, or as someone said: economic collapse. People can get very extreme, desperate and violent when their whole world comes crashing down on them.

Anyway, it'll be over something the world cannot accept as "proper behavior." Maybe a military group full of radicals will take over and declare war in the name of a diety. Who knows. It'll be coined: "The Crusade of the Apocolapse."

I'm sure it'll have something to do with the holy land and taking it back for whatever country/religion. Maybe invading a country seems to be the only way to keep the whole region from collapse. Or maybe religion will be the only thing left for people to believe in.

Blueh 02-02-2013 04:38 AM

Quote:

Posted by Pimpsy G. (Post 291130)
I'm not so sure that this will happen considering that there are many other areas available to use oil outside of the middle east, its just the cheapest one with our current technology. Its more likely that we will develop some sort of alternative to oil, and then the middle east will collapse. Really the entire middle east is the equivalent of a massive "boom" town. Its recent rise is entirely due to the oil business, without that, it will fall apart.

I still think that it could happen. Even if China doesn't even use the oil that much, they could just take over the pipelines simply just to have them as a way of saying "in-your-face America" without instigating a war and simply for more profit. Then of course there could be a dispute between Israelis and Palestinians and China is asked to pick a side and they end up going with the Palestinians because of the oil. UN throws a hissy fit. China tries and justifies their actions. The US and Zionists are all like: nope! Then one by one everyone starts declaring war on one another, North Korea possibly siding with China. Islamic African countries like Egypt and Sudan join in with them. US and European nations back the Zionists along with Japan and South Korea. Before you know it, WWIII.

Shurikan 02-02-2013 04:40 AM

Quote:

Posted by Xenthic (Post 290693)
It's all on religion, I think something like this is predicted in the bible :0


Pimpsy G. 02-02-2013 04:48 AM

Quote:

Posted by Xenthic (Post 290693)
It's all on religion, I think something like this is predicted in the bible :0

Religion may cause it, but its not going to predict anything. Out of any book, revelation is probably the most wacko and unreliable. Its been translated so many times and its metaphors are so vague it doesn't really mean anything at this point, even if it was some sort of cryptic "prophecy" as some people say.

GOAT 02-02-2013 06:52 AM

You dont have to worry about this as long as the us is the top dawg.

iHot 02-02-2013 04:26 PM

Quote:

Posted by GOAT (Post 291221)
You dont have to worry about this as long as the us is the top dawg.

Lol the US ain't top dawg Russia is. Russia is allied with Iran and China.

GOAT 02-02-2013 04:51 PM

Quote:

Posted by iHot (Post 291434)
Lol the US ain't top dawg Russia is. Russia is allied with Iran and China.

Russia 0o lol good one dude Only because our economy sucks it doesnt mean we aint running the show. Iran and russia are non factors in having any big effect on a world war. Personaly i think china could give the us a run for its money but why would they even consider it when they dont have any strong allies. Iran and nkorea aint **** even with their nuclear weapons. The us already saved the world once and if it was ever in danger again we would come to the rescue again. If u dont believe me ask ur teacher how come u aint german.

Era News 02-02-2013 09:54 PM

I honestly think America is the worst country in the world, they are the idiots that brought the 9/11 on themselves, really I think that the one that was supposed to hit the White House should of hit those suckers and, instead, the ones that were supposed to hit the twin towers run out of fuel. You (when I say you I mean the government) idiots should start staying out of other people's business, if you don't it will mark the end to your "great nation". And if they start WW3 god I hope the idiots that run Australia don't go to help and lose thousands of our men in the process.

NCJohn 02-02-2013 10:20 PM

Quote:

Posted by Blueh (Post 291148)
I still think that it could happen. Even if China doesn't even use the oil that much, they could just take over the pipelines simply just to have them as a way of saying "in-your-face America" without instigating a war and simply for more profit. Then of course there could be a dispute between Israelis and Palestinians and China is asked to pick a side and they end up going with the Palestinians because of the oil. UN throws a hissy fit. China tries and justifies their actions. The US and Zionists are all like: nope! Then one by one everyone starts declaring war on one another, North Korea possibly siding with China. Islamic African countries like Egypt and Sudan join in with them. US and European nations back the Zionists along with Japan and South Korea. Before you know it, WWIII.

I am almost certain China would not go to war with us for the simple fact that we owe them to much money. If they were to destroy us in war they would not see their money back. Although they may not be the friendliest with us they wouldn't attack us.

Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 291582)
I honestly think America is the worst country in the world, they are the idiots that brought the 9/11 on themselves, really I think that the one that was supposed to hit the White House should of hit those suckers and, instead, the ones that were supposed to hit the twin towers run out of fuel. You (when I say you I mean the government) idiots should start staying out of other people's business, if you don't it will mark the end to your "great nation". And if they start WW3 god I hope the idiots that run Australia don't go to help and lose thousands of our men in the process.

This has to be the most ignorant piece of **** I've seen to date on these forums. You are a disgrace to your country; to have wished death upon anyone is quite low of yourself. From what I can tell, you hardly even know a thing about 9/11. For starters, the plane that crashes in Pennsylvania intended for the white house didn't run out of fuel a group of brave passengers helped wrestle back the plane from the terrorist. I'm sure your fellow countrymen on these forums don't have the same ignorant view as you and are infact that you represent them and their country.

Era News 02-02-2013 10:31 PM

Quote:

Posted by NCJohn (Post 291586)

I am almost certain China would not go to war with us for the simple fact that we owe them to much money. If they were to destroy us in war they would not see their money back. Although they may not be the friendliest with us they wouldn't attack us.

This has to be the most ignorant piece of **** I've seen to date on these forums. You are a disgrace to your country; to have wished death upon anyone is quite low of yourself. From what I can tell, you hardly even know a thing about 9/11. For starters, the plane that crashes in Pennsylvania intended for the white house didn't run out of fuel a group of brave passengers helped wrestle back the plane from the terrorist. I'm sure your fellow countrymen on these forums don't have the same ignorant view as you and are infact that you represent them and their country.

Whoops apologies! That's what I meant! And I'm not the one representing a country that feeds money off wars that kills hundreds of thousands of men in the process, honestly dropping those bombs on Libyan aircraft hangers was you stupidest idea yet, you are going to start something much bigger then you can win and then what will your government do? They'll send innocent troops out to the front lines to an almost certain death.

MementoJoker 02-02-2013 10:40 PM

Quote:

Posted by Blueh (Post 290841)
I think WWIII could start by the US losing power in the middle east (like it is now) and with it, power over oil reserves and pipelines. Debt increases, we are no longer able to pay for foreign goods in fear of continuing to harm the economy. Depression sets in. China steps in and uses this to vantage. They will not directly instigate war, rather slowly begin to gain influence in areas of the middle east and of pipelines previously used bt the US. Tensions between Zionists and radical Muslims increase. More battles, more turmoil. All of it builds up and then it happens. The most destructive, conservative and intelligent war that will bring the world to its knees.

I actually support that the US loses its influence in the Middle East. :-)
Quote:

Posted by Blueh (Post 291148)
I still think that it could happen. Even if China doesn't even use the oil that much, they could just take over the pipelines simply just to have them as a way of saying "in-your-face America" without instigating a war and simply for more profit. Then of course there could be a dispute between Israelis and Palestinians and China is asked to pick a side and they end up going with the Palestinians because of the oil. UN throws a hissy fit. China tries and justifies their actions. The US and Zionists are all like: nope! Then one by one everyone starts declaring war on one another, North Korea possibly siding with China. Islamic African countries like Egypt and Sudan join in with them. US and European nations back the Zionists along with Japan and South Korea. Before you know it, WWIII.

Egypt and both Sudanese countries have their own problems before they start getting at war with countries they're actually benefiting from.

Pazx 02-03-2013 03:19 AM

Quote:

Posted by NCJohn (Post 291586)
This has to be the most ignorant piece of **** I've seen to date on these forums. You are a disgrace to your country; to have wished death upon anyone is quite low of yourself. From what I can tell, you hardly even know a thing about 9/11. For starters, the plane that crashes in Pennsylvania intended for the white house didn't run out of fuel a group of brave passengers helped wrestle back the plane from the terrorist. I'm sure your fellow countrymen on these forums don't have the same ignorant view as you and are infact that you represent them and their country.

Nobody here wishes death upon anyone, and we're all sorry for the lives that were lost on September 11, but to be fair it was a well deserved wake up call to the US government.

Quote:

Posted by Blueh (Post 290841)
I think WWIII could start by the US losing power in the middle east (like it is now) and with it, power over oil reserves and pipelines. Debt increases, we are no longer able to pay for foreign goods in fear of continuing to harm the economy. Depression sets in. China steps in and uses this to vantage. They will not directly instigate war, rather slowly begin to gain influence in areas of the middle east and of pipelines previously used bt the US. Tensions between Zionists and radical Muslims increase. More battles, more turmoil. All of it builds up and then it happens. The most destructive, conservative and intelligent war that will bring the world to its knees.

Tone it down a bit, Satan.

Pimpsy G. 02-03-2013 03:27 AM

Quote:

Posted by Dimentio (Post 291603)
I actually support that the US loses its influence in the Middle East. :-)

What? So the entire area will destabilize to a state similar to that of Africa is in and potentially become prone to nuclear war? We're talking about leaders that want to wipe out an entire country at whatever the cost because of religious intentions. We're talking about leaders that deny the holocaust existed. Places like Iran have to be held in check, because if they get a nuke, they will use it and start a nuclear war.

NCJohn 02-03-2013 03:33 AM

Quote:

Posted by Pazx (Post 291772)
Nobody here wishes death upon anyone, and we're all sorry for the lives that were lost on September 11, but to be fair it was a well deserved wake up call to the US government.



Tone it down a bit, Satan.

The death of thousands of innocent lives was deserved?

Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 291598)
Whoops apologies! That's what I meant! And I'm not the one representing a country that feeds money off wars that kills hundreds of thousands of men in the process, honestly dropping those bombs on Libyan aircraft hangers was you stupidest idea yet, you are going to start something much bigger then you can win and then what will your government do? They'll send innocent troops out to the front lines to an almost certain death.

In case you didn't realize the U.S. didn't just bomb random innocent civlians in Libya; they and the United Nations bombed targets of Gafafi's regime like his aircraft hangers to prevent him from further slaughtering his own people.

Pazx 02-03-2013 03:34 AM

Quote:

Posted by NCJohn (Post 291782)
The death of thousands of innocent lives was deserved?

Did I say that? The innocent did not deserve to be taken, however the tragic event itself was bound to happen eventually.

NCJohn 02-03-2013 03:36 AM

Quote:

Posted by Pazx (Post 291783)
Did I say that? The innocent did not deserve to be taken, however the tragic event itself was bound to happen eventually.

I understand but I think "well deserved" was a wrong choice of words there. I understand it wasn't intentional but it sounded rather insenstive.

Pazx 02-03-2013 03:41 AM

Quote:

Posted by NCJohn (Post 291786)
I understand but I think "well deserved" was a wrong choice of words there. I understand it wasn't intentional but it sounded rather insenstive.

I was thinking "necessary" would be even more insensitive so I was kinda lost for words.

NCJohn 02-03-2013 03:43 AM

Quote:

Posted by Pazx (Post 291791)
I was thinking "necessary" would be even more insensitive so I was kinda lost for words.

It's ok, I understand what you were trying to say and I do admit the U.S. government has made some real bone-headed mistakes over the past decade or two.

Era News 02-03-2013 04:11 AM

Quote:

Posted by NCJohn (Post 291782)

The death of thousands of innocent lives was deserved?

In case you didn't realize the U.S. didn't just bomb random innocent civlians in Libya; they and the United Nations bombed targets of Gafafi's regime like his aircraft hangers to prevent him from further slaughtering his own people.

They should mind their own business, the rebels would of still won the war btw just with a few more dead people but they would also learn some new tactics to prevent it. But what about next time they are in a war and there's no US government to back them up? It'll mean certain death.

And what if gadafi won the war even after the US bombed the hangers? The US would have to step in like they did in the Middle East, that means more death but more money for the US.

MrSimons 02-03-2013 04:18 AM

Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 291810)
They should mind their own business, the rebels would of still won the war btw just with a few more dead people but they would also learn some new tactics to prevent it. But what about next time they are in a war and there's no US government to back them up? It'll mean certain death.

And what if gadafi won the war even after the US bombed the hangers? The US would have to step in like they did in the Middle East, that means more death but more money for the US.

I agree with your first sentence, the US is not the world's police and should stop acting like it.

NCJohn 02-03-2013 04:21 AM

Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 291810)
They should mind their own business, the rebels would of still won the war btw just with a few more dead people but they would also learn some new tactics to prevent it. But what about next time they are in a war and there's no US government to back them up? It'll mean certain death.

And what if gadafi won the war even after the US bombed the hangers? The US would have to step in like they did in the Middle East, that means more death but more money for the US.

Explain to me how exactly the U.S. makes money from a military conflict? You really are stretching it with this one; so earlier you were saying how you are sickened by all the innocent lives lost due to the U.S. but now you are saying that the murder of innocent Libyan civilians would be ok in the long run? You are really contrdicting yourself; you should really rethink your claims before you type them up.

Era News 02-03-2013 05:12 AM

Quote:

Posted by NCJohn (Post 291816)

Explain to me how exactly the U.S. makes money from a military conflict? You really are stretching it with this one; so earlier you were saying how you are sickened by all the innocent lives lost due to the U.S. but now you are saying that the murder of innocent Libyan civilians would be ok in the long run? You are really contrdicting yourself; you should really rethink your claims before you type them up.

Once again, apologises for not explaining my point more thoroughly. I'll argue more later.

Rexx 02-03-2013 05:21 AM

Quote:

Posted by iHot (Post 291434)
Lol the US ain't top dawg Russia is. Russia is allied with Iran and China.

Lolwat? Russia?
Top dawg is either China or the U.S. in terms of economic and military power. Economic would lean towards China due to their rapid growth. The U.S. has the best military in the world by far, and we should considering the defense budget.

Era News 02-03-2013 05:51 AM

Quote:

Posted by Rexx (Post 291883)
Lolwat? Russia?
Top dawg is either China or the U.S. in terms of economic and military power. Economic would lean towards China due to their rapid growth. The U.S. has the best military in the world by far, and we should considering the defense budget.

Sorry to break it to you, but soon that won't be the case.

Blueh 02-03-2013 06:13 AM

I sense a second Cold War coming on with China. If they put all that money to military use then we're outmanned and by far outgunned. But it isn't the communists that worry me, it's the Zionists and their camps.

MrSimons 02-03-2013 06:26 AM

I'm worried about those mother ****ing penguins, they are planning something.

Era News 02-03-2013 06:26 AM

Quote:

Posted by MrSimons (Post 291913)
I'm worried about those mother ****ing penguins, they are planning something.

You saw those looks to?! I thought I was crazy!

Rexx 02-03-2013 06:51 AM

Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 291900)
Sorry to break it to you, but soon that won't be the case.

Concerning what?

Era News 02-03-2013 07:37 AM

Quote:

Posted by Rexx (Post 291927)
Concerning what?

America having the most power in the world. I have nothing against America itself, it's a great country and I'd rather it running it running the worlds economy then some stupid communist country. I respect it for what it is though, a country. It's just your joke of a government who's going to ruin it.

Rexx 02-03-2013 08:43 AM

Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 291954)
America having the most power in the world. I have nothing against America itself, it's a great country and I'd rather it running it then some stupid communist country. I respect it for what it is though, a country. It's just your joke of a government who's going to ruin it.

You never said how it's going to change though.

GOAT 02-03-2013 10:04 PM

Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 291582)
I honestly think America is the worst country in the world.

Depends what you’re talking about. When it comes to moral values and ethics from our government it’s debatable. When it comes to having power and influence no one has more than the us.
Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 291582)
they are the idiots that brought the 9/11 on themselves.

Why is that? Because we try to maintain some sort of world peace. Im sure the us gets a bad rep for getting involved in conflicts that have some type of benefit to themselves but at least they try to maintain order. You think if the communist gain control they would be as nice as the Americans.
Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 291582)
I honestly think America is the worst country in the world.

Another note on this is that you have to understand that you cant judge the American people by the actions of its government.

T-10a 02-05-2013 05:26 AM

The details of WW3 isn't complex, eventually nukes. Then the events of Fallout 1 happen, with less retro-futuristic stuffs. And so on.


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:52 PM.

Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.