Graalians

Graalians (https://www.graalians.com/forums/index.php)
-   Off-Topic Chat (https://www.graalians.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=14)
-   -   Watch as gay slurs get posted on Twitter in real-time (https://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25828)

Imprint 09-08-2014 07:44 PM

How is it any different from "That is ******ed"?

Emera 09-08-2014 08:03 PM

Quote:

Posted by Crono (Post 504293)
Man, you really are on a jihad against a couple of slurs. Carry on.

Not just him. Me too.

Quote:

Posted by Imprint (Post 504300)
How is it any different from "That is ******ed"?

It's not any different. That's just as bad.

Crono 09-08-2014 08:41 PM

Quote:

Posted by Fysez (Post 504267)
Still doesn't make it right.

Did I claim it's right to spam ******?

Kendama 09-08-2014 09:31 PM

Quote:

Posted by Imprint (Post 504300)
How is it any different from "That is ******ed"?

To be fair, at least "that is retarted" actually kind of makes sense as retarted means slow or of disability or handicap and it is usually used to describe "stupid, slow, and illogical" things. EXA: "My teacher in math class have us three packets to finish by tommorow. She is so retarted" In this sense the kid is just replacing the word "stupid" with "retarted". Pretty much just giving a stronger version of the word that can be offensive and people are more sensitive about.

While I am not condoning it, I can understand why we as people use that word rather than the gay slurs.

Gay slurs are often used on nearly everything that has not to do with the homosexual world and are usually just used to degrade a regular person or as a typical immature insult.

Imprint 09-08-2014 10:34 PM

******ed was originally a medical term for the mentally disabled. Now, people use it differently. You cannot argue that using gay to mean stupid is wrong and then turn around and ignore the word ******ed.

Cookie Xanadu 09-08-2014 11:14 PM

Quote:

Posted by Imprint (Post 504325)
******ed was originally a medical term for the mentally disabled. Now, people use it differently. You cannot argue that using gay to mean stupid is wrong and then turn around and ignore the word ******ed.

Pretty much the same can be said of a lot of words. I could be wrong on this but, ****** was meant as a bundle of sticks for burning. Gay was happy. ***** was strange and now they're all derogatory!

Mangsi 09-08-2014 11:28 PM

Quote:

Posted by Dawn (Post 504168)
The people i least expect are gay(i don't suspect anyone to be gay that i know of,especially on these forums)

thx bebe, but I'm the gayest person in the world once you get to know me.
I just choose not to show my rainbows off.

OT: well...I hate when people do use gay slurs in general, whether it's used against someone joking or not. But people will be people, and we can't force them to stop.

Imprint 09-09-2014 12:50 AM

Quote:

Posted by Cookie Xanadu (Post 504337)
Pretty much the same can be said of a lot of words. I could be wrong on this but, ****** was meant as a bundle of sticks for burning. Gay was happy. ***** was strange and now they're all derogatory!

Right. Meanings change, and they're not always pleasant.

wildkeldeo 09-09-2014 01:52 AM

You're a carrot!

Watch that word become an insult....

Fysez 09-09-2014 04:04 AM

Quote:

Posted by Crono (Post 504313)
Did I claim it's right to spam ******?

If you want to get sassy, I never claimed you did say it's right.

Dawn 09-09-2014 04:39 AM

Quote:

Posted by Fysez (Post 504411)
If you want to get sassy, I never claimed you did say it's right.

Such royalty in those words.

Thallen 09-09-2014 04:38 PM

Quote:

Posted by Craftz1 (Post 504011)
Am I a bad person for thinking gay is disgusting?

nope
I also think the act of two males engaging in sexual intercourse is disgusting

doesn't make me a homophobe and there's absolutely nothing wrong with thinking that
if someone tells you otherwise, it's because they've been pampered and sensitized by media bull**** that has severely blurred the lines of defining what is homophobic, racist, sexist, etc.

the #1 thing that bothers me about homosexuals fighting for gay rights or women practicing feminism is how the majority claim that the underlying goal is equality, yet they go so far out of their way to try and be treated differently (or above) "the norm"
gay pride makes absolutely no sense to me, because I don't care if you're gay and it's senseless to take pride in something you allegedly can't control - I only care when you make some elaborate effort to get everyone in the world to know that you're gay and then get treated specially for it

I don't have any gay friends, but I wouldn't mind having one as long as their entire life did not revolve around the fact that they're gay, because it's not important or even interesting

Crono 09-09-2014 07:11 PM

Quote:

Posted by Thallen (Post 504522)
nope
I also think the act of two males engaging in sexual intercourse is disgusting

doesn't make me a homophobe and there's absolutely nothing wrong with thinking that
if someone tells you otherwise, it's because they've been pampered and sensitized by media bull**** that has severely blurred the lines of defining what is homophobic, racist, sexist, etc.

the #1 thing that bothers me about homosexuals fighting for gay rights or women practicing feminism is how the majority claim that the underlying goal is equality, yet they go so far out of their way to try and be treated differently (or above) "the norm"
gay pride makes absolutely no sense to me, because I don't care if you're gay and it's senseless to take pride in something you allegedly can't control - I only care when you make some elaborate effort to get everyone in the world to know that you're gay and then get treated specially for it

I don't have any gay friends, but I wouldn't mind having one as long as their entire life did not revolve around the fact that they're gay, because it's not important or even interesting

Pretty much how I feel, but to add on to your thing about feminism and ****...it's like...I dunno. You (plural, not you) claim to be fighting for equality yet you're only catering to one group and focus on the rights for just that one group. It makes no sense. If you actually believe in equality then you'd preach general equality, not focus on just ONE thing that needs to be "pushed up" to equality. It's weird to me, I dunno.

There's some bat**** feminists running for power here in Sweden, they're pretty much your tumblr type of idiots. It's really dumb too, because Sweden is quite equal and has always been progressive when it comes to homosexuality and gender inequality.

Imprint 09-09-2014 07:53 PM

You don't need support if you are already ahead.

Crono 09-09-2014 08:01 PM

Quote:

Posted by Imprint (Post 504548)
You don't need support if you are already ahead.

If you're a feminist wouldn't you fight for racial/gay/etc equality/rights if you truly do believe in equality for all? Seems more like "lul im a gurl and im guna feminist becuz it promotes meee", least it does in Sweden.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.