Graalians

Graalians (https://www.graalians.com/forums/index.php)
-   GraalOnline Era (https://www.graalians.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=13)
-   -   graal sucks now (https://www.graalians.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9293)

FaZ3 08-10-2012 08:48 AM

We should send an email to stefan demanding a trading system all at the same time :]

Shock 08-10-2012 01:21 PM

I think asking for the millionth time is a waste of time. There's no real way to keep the game profitable, even if you make it an equal trading style system(ex: 2 peacemakers=1 bar). I'm leaning away from the idea of a trading system now.

Might as well give unlimited refunds on all items purchased at any spontaneous time.

Maxy 08-10-2012 02:57 PM

pay2win

Wolfy 08-10-2012 04:27 PM

Oh so it sucks? I guess making a thread will change it all in your mind.

lord greg 08-10-2012 05:30 PM

Quote:

Posted by Talon (Post 177450)
If you're referring to PC, it isn't the trading that ruins the game's economy. It's the fact that they can be traded at all (drops/system). In short, trading guns kills the economy because players won't buy from stores anymore, because they can capitalize between each other for cheaper prices. If a guy wants a BAR, eventually with time, he's not going to go to the store to purchase a BAR. Instead, he'll look for a player that doesn't want the BAR who will sell it for a lower price. This causes guns to lose value quickly. The cycle will repeat, and sooner or later, inflation occurs since peoples' guns aren't sitting idle in their inventory, but now rather a happier owner who will put use to it.

Also, becauae you can trade unwanted guns for other guns, you won't have to shell/buy packs to get that new gun. When this happens, players won't buy any more packs which leads to a loss in revenue for developers. That is a fatal mistake for any game, seeing as Era PC has had multiple server resets in the past.

-

If you were talking about iEra, the same reasons as above. Though, I don't see a problem in a trade system for items that are already droppable. Just no items that aren't droppable (i.e. guns).

for once i agree with you

and for the people who want balanced guns i fail to see how that will improve this. I think it may make it quite boring cuz everone will use the cheapest guns therefore it means you cant have different guns for different tasks. but thats just my opinion

SnakeRekon 08-10-2012 06:57 PM

Untill you've experienced several Era PC resets, most of you will never understand the flaws of the economic system.
Most of the servers really are not capable of handling an economy well, I completely disagree with the amount of droppables there are on IEra, including shells.
It was a terrible mistake in my eyes to have money items droppable.

Gun's seem pretty balanced these days x.x
Cloyd did release too many guns too fast, needed a much slower progression to me.

Era's main problem is lack of a game-plan so to speak, most of the work is spontainious and unplanned lol

MementoJoker 08-10-2012 07:15 PM

Making trash/mushrooms/shells droppable worsens the economy and encourages scamming.

Sungwonc01 08-10-2012 09:19 PM

Quote:

Posted by Derpawy (Post 177648)
Making trash/mushrooms/shells droppable worsens the economy and encourages scamming.

Please enlighten me.

Billy 08-11-2012 01:14 AM

Quote:

Posted by SnakeRekon (Post 177642)
Untill you've experienced several Era PC resets, most of you will never understand the flaws of the economic system.
Most of the servers really are not capable of handling an economy well, I completely disagree with the amount of droppables there are on IEra, including shells.
It was a terrible mistake in my eyes to have money items droppable.

Gun's seem pretty balanced these days x.x
Cloyd did release too many guns too fast, needed a much slower progression to me.

Era's main problem is lack of a game-plan so to speak, most of the work is spontainious and unplanned lol

Well the game was a lot better when new guns were released,Oh how I miss Cloyd.

DarkKnight 08-11-2012 02:26 AM

unixmad and his bread...

//#Y SO UNIXMAD?

Spotzy Creedz 08-11-2012 03:09 AM

You should play era pc for a day and you will see that iEra gun prices are not that bad.

Talon 08-11-2012 04:37 AM

Quote:

Posted by DarkKnight (Post 177871)
unixmad and his bread...

//#Y SO UNIXMAD?

U(nix)mad bro?

Waffle 08-11-2012 06:26 AM

Give the staff team some time, they are trying there best to make new content as fast as they possibly can.

Johnaudi 08-11-2012 08:14 AM

Quote:

Posted by Spotzy Creedz (Post 177899)
You should play era pc for a day and you will see that iEra gun prices are not that bad.

On PC it's harder to get money, on iEra people complain the price of the BAR(200,000$) well, on PC a gun/melee can go up to 2,000,000$. = Economy ruined.
2nd, droppable guns, which make them stop buying guns from the store (as Talon stated). = Economy Ruined
3rd, lack of speed the player has and can get. = PK ruined.
4th, amount of player decreasing. = Players won't play at this point (if it was me, i'd not like to play alone in a server)

Billy 08-12-2012 09:51 AM

Quote:

Posted by Johnaudi (Post 178018)
On PC it's harder to get money, on iEra people complain the price of the BAR(200,000$) well, on PC a gun/melee can go up to 2,000,000$. = Economy ruined.
2nd, droppable guns, which make them stop buying guns from the store (as Talon stated). = Economy Ruined
3rd, lack of speed the player has and can get. = PK ruined.
4th, amount of player decreasing. = Players won't play at this point (if it was me, i'd not like to play alone in a server)

On PC i sold my bar for 320k..not much higher. number 2 is pretty true...number 3...its called a LIGHT WEIGHT POTION,i usually pk without one and do fine.. number 4...well the player count has been at 40-100 for a year now,and i never lag on it like i do on iEra .

btw PC is easier to gain money on,it depends on your mining level..

Talon 08-12-2012 09:53 AM

I don't get why you would play on a server with only 60~ people. That sounds boring.

Emera 08-12-2012 09:59 AM

Quote:

Posted by Talon (Post 178729)
I don't get why you would play on a server with only 60~ people. That sounds boring.

Say what? 60~ people sounds like a successful server to me.

SnakeRekon 08-12-2012 12:08 PM

Quote:

Posted by Billy (Post 177809)
Well the game was a lot better when new guns were released,Oh how I miss Cloyd.

Okay so; sure we can throw 50 million guns at you, but at the end of the day you're all just going to grab the most powerful and use that, so releasing all those guns is pretty much for nothing.
More shall be released, just be patient.

@Emera, 60 is nothing to the 200+ back in the day

Emera 08-12-2012 12:10 PM

Quote:

Posted by SnakeRekon (Post 178779)
Okay so; sure we can throw 50 million guns at you, but at the end of the day you're all just going to grab the most powerful and use that, so releasing all those guns is pretty much for nothing.
More shall be released, just be patient.

@Emera, 60 is nothing to the 200+ back in the day

Yeah, I know but 60~ players on a server is a decent player count really. Most PC servers struggle to reach that.

Johnaudi 08-12-2012 02:01 PM

Quote:

Posted by Billy (Post 178728)
On PC i sold my bar for 320k..not much higher. number 2 is pretty true...number 3...its called a LIGHT WEIGHT POTION,i usually pk without one and do fine.. number 4...well the player count has been at 40-100 for a year now,and i never lag on it like i do on iEra .

btw PC is easier to gain money on,it depends on your mining level..

Probably you'd never lag because it's NOT lag, you guys basically mistake it, that's the RAM and the CPU, iOS Devices get buggy when interfered with high tense of connection, if you play on an old windows with 512mb RAM you'll bug as much as an iPad 1.
It's the server that gets laggy or your Internet connection.

Also, mining is practically the only good way to get money without being following by people desperate for kills, and it's still not enough for extra expensive guns.
iEra is meant to fit in your pocket.

SnakeRekon 08-12-2012 02:42 PM

I've already considered some upgrades for mining..
I'll probably write some detailed information out for Snk and see what he thinks.

Johnaudi 08-12-2012 03:41 PM

Quote:

Posted by SnakeRekon (Post 178817)
I've already considered some upgrades for mining..
I'll probably write some detailed information out for Snk and see what he thinks.

Oh no, mining is already good to be used for money and for gun upgrades, if you're going to upgrade a job, I'd recommend to upgrade Flower Picking :)

Skill 08-12-2012 08:33 PM

Quote:

Posted by SnakeRekon (Post 178817)
I've already considered some upgrades for mining..
I'll probably write some detailed information out for Snk and see what he thinks.

Good to know, I feel like the mining system is broken.

It takes forever to reach a level where it makes a significant difference, you can hardly notice anything. Based on the way it works your rate improves more for leveling at high levels than low, it should be the opposite.

Low levels should get better rewards for leveling, and have it gradually decrease as you level.

like it takes 10 secs to mine at 1, 9 at 2, 8.2 at 3, 7.5 at 4, 7 at 5, 6.6 at 6.

See what I mean? Eventually when you are at like 40 it would only be a slight difference, so that people don't get to insane levels and make too much money like on pc era, but leveling still helps.

Also the money gain needs to be buffed, even at like level 60(which no one has reached, highest I've heard of is someone at 32 that mines like all day) shoveling is still significantly faster.

Don't remove levels though, because people who put a lot of time into leveling like the level 32 would be really upset. if you do though, give us a large compensation, like say an additional $10 per rock mined.

Billy 08-13-2012 08:07 AM

Quote:

Posted by Johnaudi (Post 178799)
Probably you'd never lag because it's NOT lag, you guys basically mistake it, that's the RAM and the CPU, iOS Devices get buggy when interfered with high tense of connection, if you play on an old windows with 512mb RAM you'll bug as much as an iPad 1.
It's the server that gets laggy or your Internet connection.

English,please? Read what's under my name.

Quote:

Posted by Johnaudi (Post 178799)

Also, mining is practically the only good way to get money without being following by people desperate for kills, and it's still not enough for extra expensive guns.
iEra is meant to fit in your pocket.

Lol mining does get you **** loads on PC,my friend is a milionaire from mining..Digging couldn't compare to PC mining.. Im not joking my friend makes 10k in half an hour.. o.o

Johnaudi 08-13-2012 09:01 AM

Quote:

Posted by Billy (Post 179233)
English,please? Read what's under my name.

It is english, you just don't understand :) .
Quote:

Lol mining does get you **** loads on PC,my friend is a milionaire from mining..Digging couldn't compare to PC mining.. Im not joking my friend makes 10k in half an hour.. o.o
It's either Macro's either no-life. And it would be not enough, a good gun always costs around millions. And yet again that 1 good gun.

Quote:

Posted by Skill (Post 178932)
Good to know, I feel like the mining system is broken.

It takes forever to reach a level where it makes a significant difference, you can hardly notice anything. Based on the way it works your rate improves more for leveling at high levels than low, it should be the opposite.

Low levels should get better rewards for leveling, and have it gradually decrease as you level.

like it takes 10 secs to mine at 1, 9 at 2, 8.2 at 3, 7.5 at 4, 7 at 5, 6.6 at 6.

See what I mean? Eventually when you are at like 40 it would only be a slight difference, so that people don't get to insane levels and make too much money like on pc era, but leveling still helps.

Also the money gain needs to be buffed, even at like level 60(which no one has reached, highest I've heard of is someone at 32 that mines like all day) shoveling is still significantly faster.

Don't remove levels though, because people who put a lot of time into leveling like the level 32 would be really upset. if you do though, give us a large compensation, like say an additional $10 per rock mined.

People would go more thru mining then digging then, since mining already upgrades your weapons.

lord greg 08-13-2012 06:41 PM

Quote:

Posted by SnakeRekon (Post 178779)
Okay so; sure we can throw 50 million guns at you, but at the end of the day you're all just going to grab the most powerful and use that, so releasing all those guns is pretty much for nothing.
More shall be released, just be patient.

@Emera, 60 is nothing to the 200+ back in the day

lol just dont keep increasing price maybe if you release a gun better than bar put at same price and decrease bars price

SnakeRekon 08-13-2012 06:56 PM

Quote:

Posted by lord greg (Post 179453)
lol just dont keep increasing price maybe if you release a gun better than bar put at same price and decrease bars price

Better than bar.. x.x
So you want to annoy the 100's of people who already bought a bar for 200k, then lower the price and release one at the same price? o.o;; makes no sense.

Would make more sense just to delete the BAR from the store than your suggestion

lord greg 08-13-2012 07:18 PM

Quote:

Posted by SnakeRekon (Post 179458)
Better than bar.. x.x
So you want to annoy the 100's of people who already bought a bar for 200k, then lower the price and release one at the same price? o.o;; makes no sense.

Would make more sense just to delete the BAR from the store than your suggestion

otherwise you will end up with stupidly high prices for guns which people wont buy. and theres no point making realy bad guns cuz no one will want them

Talon 08-13-2012 07:20 PM

Quote:

Posted by lord greg (Post 179453)
lol just dont keep increasing price maybe if you release a gun better than bar put at same price and decrease bars price

Genius.

Quote:

Posted by Billy (Post 179233)
English,please? Read what's under my name.

He's basically talking about the computer's performance as opposed to your devices. iDevices, like he said, are generally more susceptible to internet connection lag as opposed to a regular computer on wired connection. They can lag so bad at times that it can be around the same performance as, say, a Windows 98 with 512MB RAM (basically operations it can handle at once), which is very low in retrospect to computers nowadays, which have upwards of 32GB RAM.

In short, the reason iEra lags is because you're playing on an iDevice, which blows internet connection-wise, and only has about 512MB RAM, which is hardly enough for iEra's high playercount. PC doesn't lag because it has more RAM and can handle more players/operations.

lord greg 08-13-2012 07:25 PM

Quote:

Posted by Talon (Post 179471)
Genius.



He's basically talking about the computer's performance as opposed to your devices. iDevices, like he said, are generally more susceptible to internet connection lag as opposed to a regular computer on wired connection. They can lag so bad at times that it can be around the same performance as, say, a Windows 98 with 512MB RAM (basically operations it can handle at once), which is very low in retrospect to computers nowadays, which have upwards of 32GB RAM.

In short, the reason iEra lags is because you're playing on an iDevice, which blows internet connection-wise, and only has about 512MB RAM, which is hardly enough for iEra's high playercount. PC doesn't lag because it has more RAM and can handle more players/operations.

so basically lag is bad

Talon 08-13-2012 07:42 PM

Quote:

Posted by lord greg (Post 179468)
otherwise you will end up with stupidly high prices for guns which people wont buy. and theres no point making realy bad guns cuz no one will want them

Can you at least type in acceptable English grammar so I can take you seriously? The reason they won't take your suggestion into action is because it would completely defeat the purpose of price-performance value. If you're going to make a gun cheaper and release a better gun at the same price, people with the former gun are going to go up in arms about being ripped off. They paid the same price for a mediocre gun while other people got a better gun for the same price. The BAR doesn't have to be the threshold for top tier gun prices, things are probably going to go higher than it in the future. That doesn't mean everyone's going to buy it though.

Also, guns can be relatively cheap and still cost-efficient - we've seen a ton of them released and buffed lately. The Colt 6 is an amazing gun that can easily compete with M4 and Shipkas, which are leaps and bounds over its price. I'll reiterate what I've said a thousand times on price:performance threads. Price to performance ratio is never the same, and there will be guns that are disproportionate to the norm, if its for better or for worse. Let's use the Colt 6 for example. It has a 30,000 price tag, and sports 7 damage and a clip of 6. If we kept the Shipka at an exact price to performance ratio, then the Shipka would have 28 damage and a clip of 24. If you haven't noticed, guns that are raising in price aren't much better than guns that are considerably lower than it. The BAR isn't and arm and a leg over the Tachi Scorpion for the extra 170.000 you pay for it. The only real upgrade the BAR has on the Scorpion is the extra 2 damage and maybe a higher clip size. When you're into the top tier guns like the Shipka and BAR, the price-performance ratio plummets. At this point, you're just paying the extra 100.000 upgrade to chase that last 0.2 reduction in freeze or that 1 extra damage, which is a horrible P:P ratio, but might still be necessary. A great example is what Skill stated earlier in the thread.

Quote:

Posted by Skill (Post 178932)
Low levels should get better rewards for leveling, and have it gradually decrease as you level.

like it takes 10 secs to mine at 1, 9 at 2, 8.2 at 3, 7.5 at 4, 7 at 5, 6.6 at 6.

The same is applicable to guns. Insanely expensive guns shouldn't have the same price to performance upgrade the Colt has over the Deagle, but rather an upgrade of the same caliber that the BAR has over the Scorpion at a similar price tag. For example, if a BAR was basically a 2 damage upgrade and a bigger mag over the Scorpion for an extra 170.000, then the next upgrade over the BAR should be 245.000 for the same upgraded 1-2 damage and a slightly higher clip size. Again, at this point, you're just paying the extra 100.000 upgrade to chase that last 0.2 reduction in freeze or that 1 extra damage. Guns were not meant to upgrade a hell of a whole lot at high prices.

lord greg 08-13-2012 07:47 PM

Quote:

Posted by Talon (Post 179488)
Can you at least type in acceptable English grammar so I can take you seriously? The reason they won't take your suggestion into action is because it would completely defeat the purpose of price-performance value. If you're going to make a gun cheaper and release a better gun at the same price, people with the former gun are going to go up in arms about being ripped off. They paid the same price for a mediocre gun while other people got a better gun for the same price. The BAR doesn't have to be the threshold for top tier gun prices, things are probably going to go higher than it in the future. That doesn't mean everyone's going to buy it though.

Also, guns can be relatively cheap and still cost-efficient - we've seen a ton of them released and buffed lately. The Colt 6 is an amazing gun that can easily compete with M4 and Shipkas, which are leaps and bounds over its price. I'll reiterate what I've said a thousand times on price:performance threads. Price to performance ratio is never the same, and there will be guns that are disproportionate to the norm, if its for better or for worse. Let's use the Colt 6 for example. It has a 30,000 price tag, and sports 7 damage and a clip of 6. If we kept the Shipka at an exact price to performance ratio, then the Shipka would have 28 damage and a clip of 24. If you haven't noticed, guns that are raising in price aren't much better than guns that are considerably lower than it. The BAR isn't and arm and a leg over the Tachi Scorpion for the extra 170.000 you pay for it. The only real upgrade the BAR has on the Scorpion is the extra 2 damage and maybe a higher clip size. When you're into the top tier guns like the Shipka and BAR, the price-performance ratio plummets. At this point, you're just paying the extra 100.000 upgrade to chase that last 0.2 reduction in freeze or that 1 extra damage, which is a horrible P:P ratio, but might still be necessary. A great example is what Skill stated earlier in the thread.



The same is applicable to guns. Insanely expensive guns shouldn't have the same price to performance upgrade the Colt has over the Deagle, but rather an upgrade of the same caliber that the BAR has over the Scorpion at a similar price tag. For example, if a BAR was basically a 2 damage upgrade and a bigger mag over the Scorpion for an extra 170.000, then the next upgrade over the BAR should be 245.000 for the same upgraded 1-2 damage and a slightly higher clip size. Again, at this point, you're just paying the extra 100.000 upgrade to chase that last 0.2 reduction in freeze or that 1 extra damage. Guns were not meant to upgrade a hell of a whole lot at high prices.

first of all i never knew you were a master of grammer and language and to be honest i fail to see how grammer has anything to do with anything on a forum such as this, also if guns become available better than a bar but cheaper then bar owners will be up in arms at that too

Talon 08-13-2012 08:11 PM

Did you even bother to read my post in its entirety? You posted 5 minutes after mine, which would probably take you 15 minutes to read and fully understand. Maybe I should just stop making long-winded posts because some idiots on this forum have an attention span of 3 minutes. Here's a tl;dr for you.

1. Grammar is important because it makes you seem less of an idiot than you actually are.
2. Guns aren't better for cheaper, they simply have better cost-efficiency (Google that, it might be too self-explanatory for your IQ to comprehend)
3. All of your posts make you out as an idiot.

BabyGhost 08-14-2012 12:05 AM

You know. I think napalm is more overpowered than bar. It's being abused a lot in last man standing. I am going 1 vs 1 with someone. This makes it like a sparring match. What do they do? Spam napalm leaving me no where to run due to the ridiculous blast radius range and the damage. Along with that leaving a huge ring of fire which blocks off my escape paths. I saw someone spar with napalm only. It just wasn't fun to watch.

Billy 08-14-2012 05:24 AM

Quote:

Posted by Talon (Post 179471)
Genius.



He's basically talking about the computer's performance as opposed to your devices. iDevices, like he said, are generally more susceptible to internet connection lag as opposed to a regular computer on wired connection. They can lag so bad at times that it can be around the same performance as, say, a Windows 98 with 512MB RAM (basically operations it can handle at once), which is very low in retrospect to computers nowadays, which have upwards of 32GB RAM.

In short, the reason iEra lags is because you're playing on an iDevice, which blows internet connection-wise, and only has about 512MB RAM, which is hardly enough for iEra's high playercount. PC doesn't lag because it has more RAM and can handle more players/operations.

True but FB Lags way more than iPod iEra.. It's based on player count trust me.. Because I never lag at 5 a.m. because there's a very low player count. I almost won tts,I was the last person but got bar spammed,I came close because there was no lag at all,and Ive never won an event due to lag.(Off-Topic)I have 10 ec due to offers/contests/gst and jazz.

Johnaudi 08-14-2012 06:20 AM

Quote:

Posted by Billy (Post 179745)
True but FB Lags way more than iPod iEra.. It's based on player count trust me.. Because I never lag at 5 a.m. because there's a very low player count. I almost won tts,I was the last person but got bar spammed,I came close because there was no lag at all,and Ive never won an event due to lag.(Off-Topic)I have 10 ec due to offers/contests/gst and jazz.

Don't you realize, that FB is using Flash Player as a genetic communication between two servers? Even when I play Minecraft (Java) on a browser or some sort of FP game I'll keep get that intense amount of bugs.
@Your Off-Topic quote, I got 16 from GST ^^, PC's EC aren't as valuable as the one's on iEra.

Era News 08-14-2012 11:09 AM

Quote:

Posted by NCJohn
Be patient; we have some pretty cool things that are being worked on that you may like.

Like more immature admins? YESSS

Johnaudi 08-14-2012 11:16 AM

Quote:

Posted by Era News (Post 179888)
Like more immature players? YESSS

fixed.

SnakeRekon 08-14-2012 11:27 AM

In regards to prices;
When I played Final Fantasy 11 a few years back, it was very common to be paying several million more than your current equipment for marginal upgrades, it's the way games work - all these small aspects add up when put together, which is why the cost increases a lot.
From a business perspective, it's logical, there will always be people who strive to be the best and want the best things in order to keep themselves at the top, thus there will always be people paying those top prices. Sure it sucks for the average consumer who will probably never reach that goal without years of work (Yes I fully understand this from the several games i've played) but some items are just not meant for everybody to attain in their game-life time.

I'll give a real big example of this; On FF11 there was this one enemy, he was called Absolute Virtue, the conditions for releasing him were ridiculiously long and he was near impossible to kill without some super secret method that only the creators knew how to do in order to make it killable. It dropped some pretty damn nice items, took several years and many thousands of different theories to actually get a workable kill to get these items, and even then it may even drop one item when you could need upto 64 players to kill it.

Anyways, just an example of a game where items aren't meant for everyone.

Era News 08-14-2012 12:37 PM

Quote:

Posted by Johnaudi
fixed.

Dude how is that even funny?

JesusFreak 08-14-2012 05:54 PM

Back to the original topic:

I agree with the fact that iEra's getting boring. I mean, I used to play every day. But now I didn't play for a few days and honestly, I'm not missing it.
Unless there are some bigger updates planned, I don't know if it's even worth to start playing again..

MementoJoker 08-14-2012 06:06 PM

Quote:

Posted by JesusFreak (Post 180006)
Back to the original topic:

I agree with the fact that iEra's getting boring. I mean, I used to play every day. But now I didn't play for a few days and honestly, I'm not missing it.
Unless there are some bigger updates planned, I don't know if it's evenness worth to start playing again..


V. 08-14-2012 06:13 PM

Quote:

Posted by JesusFreak (Post 180006)
Back to the original topic:

I agree with the fact that iEra's getting boring. I mean, I used to play every day. But now I didn't play for a few days and honestly, I'm not missing it.
Unless there are some bigger updates planned, I don't know if it's even worth to start playing again..


Talon 08-14-2012 06:42 PM

C-C-C-Combo Breaker.

JesusFreak 08-14-2012 06:54 PM

Quote:

Posted by Talon (Post 180023)
C-C-C-Combo Breaker.

Damn you :p

V. 08-14-2012 07:00 PM

You mean..
[YOUTUBE]<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7I7Ue2wX6iQ" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>[/YOUTUBE]?

salaris 08-14-2012 07:31 PM

I have to admit that playing graalclassic is more better in some cases.I'm not saying it's the best game because it needs so work to. But on graalera is totally different,the prices are higher more likely to high. The guns are the things need to be lowered. But so far on graalera your doing great keep it up. Graalclassic your doing fine just keep doing what you where doing. :)

Andy 08-14-2012 07:36 PM

Quote:

Posted by salaris (Post 180036)
I have to admit that playing graalclassic is more better in some cases.I'm not saying it's the best game because it needs so work to. But on graalera is totally different,the prices are higher more likely to high. The guns are the things need to be lowered. But so far on graalera your doing great keep it up. Graalclassic your doing fine just keep doing what you where doing. :)

If the powerful guns were made cheaper everyone would have them and it wouldn't be fun lol

eric 08-14-2012 07:41 PM

Quote:

Posted by slick (Post 176981)
attachment 40k? (i dont remember)

You obviously werent on graal when the m4 WAS 4500 because the attachment came out long after the m4 came out.

JesusFreak 08-14-2012 07:50 PM

Quote:

Posted by salaris (Post 180036)
But on graalera is totally different,the prices are higher more likely to high.

Isn't there a classic mount for 100.000$ ? ;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin/Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.