Fulgore is a try hard fulgore is a try hard la la la

I-I didn't take it personally...but...am I rly tho?? :(

looooooool not on these forums at least *wink*

hehe, so true.

They would have to add a matchmaking process based upon wins, and losses. In this game you can't really define skill based on stats though :)

No one has a bs connection, there is always a way to beat any laggy/delaying sparrers. Not saying it is easy to do this, just have to practice. If a new system is added, you don't think a lot of people will try to be the best at it? Alumni isn't the only tryhard guild. The current gs system is boring and inactive after GST.

Rewards make a game better, you feel like you are achieving something great, not really, but it feels like you accomplished something, after investing time into what you get the reward from. Having rewards is better than not having anything at all.

I don't understand why you have to insult anyone on this thread, there is no need. Insulting others just because you disagree with their ideas on how to improve the game is pointless, it does not bring anything except pity.
Winners don't talk trash, they perform.

i dont see how a tower that is taken by winning a GS match or GS reward sytem with streak rooms are better than the 2 quoted ideas below in regards to improving the GS system.

I liked the idea a lot. Maybe the arena itself could be turned into a tower ( just add a flag on top of it) So the lower part would still countain the spar rooms and one extra room for GS and the winner of the match in that room should get the flag instantly.

I never said that my ideas are better than yours. Not sure where you got that from. I only want there to be a tower based on skill, and as an actual team. Would be fun, you might not like it, does not mean there should not be one. Alumni might me good at it, does not mean they will be the only ones holding the tower/room. Anyone can spar, anyone can become good at spar.

And yes, Winners don't talk trash, they perform. What about it?

1) Towering takes skill. Without towering skill you won't hold a tower.
2) Without a team you can't hold a tower.

Not at all, just sword spam the flag, take, sword spam/block doors. No skill required.

Tower Taking takes skill especially by the means of being skilled in leadership, management, and organization. Tell me when you have a successful tower taking guild that it didn't take any skill.

I have taken so many towers where the only reason I took them was because I had my skilled members on and we put together a strategy.

Defense takes skill too. York for example. Where you position your members and where you anticipate you will get the most traffic can be the difference between losing and holding

you quoted me and made it sound as if I was against improving GS. I dont have a problem with making a tower based on skill but I guarantee you this idea doesn't make it a skilled tower. How can it be called a skilled tower when all you do is GS. If you want a tower that requires skills it has to be done in the design of the tower, not by GSing.


Something with multiple entrances, multiple flags, wide doors, good spawn points.




Ali is the greatest winner and he talked a lot of trash. You can talk trash and perform at the same time.

Comet has been the most accomplished sparer in classic and no one cries and talks trash more than he does. Talking trash and crying has nothing to do with being a winner.

Is this thread seriously still going on?

Is there a reason why you bumped a dead thread?

This is funny to me. The only tower I remember you being able to take was Sardons and that is the tower that takes the least amount of skill to take.

This is funny to me. If I recall you made a thread a few months ago complaining about how your guild couldn't take Sardons with 15+ members online and you were asking for a Sardons nerf, and now here you are saying that Sardons is the tower that requires the least amount of skill to take.

I believe the guild was called New Age Legacy II?

:D:D:D

LOOOOOOOOOOOL