08-10-2014
|
32 | |
The Cooliest?
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,117
|
|
|
08-11-2014
|
33 | |
Magnificent Bastard
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Bermuda Triangle
Posts: 463
|
Also, if you removed a fertilized egg from the womb immediately, it would not be able to survive. It's not the same as a baby. It's goop at that point. If you don't believe me, pick up a science textbook. It takes quite some time for an infant to develop enough to survive outside the womb. |
|
08-16-2014
|
34 | |
The Cooliest?
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,117
|
And we are agreeing on the same thing for your second part. |
|
08-16-2014
|
36 | |
The Cooliest?
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,117
|
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution prohibits impeding the free exercise of religion. Theology is AGAINST abortion. THUS, THEY HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO EXCERCISE FREE RELIGION. They were being forced to go against what they believe in. HMMMM... I THINK THAT SOUNDS LIKE IT'S DENYING THEIR CONSTUTIONAL RIGHT! It's a simple issue omfg |
|
08-16-2014
|
37 | |
Uguu~
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Canada, NS
Posts: 1,046
|
|
|
08-16-2014
|
38 | |
The Cooliest?
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 1,117
|
Religion always has a place. That is the beauty of Free Enterprise. |
|
08-16-2014
|
39 | |
Should be fixed.
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 6,359
|
|
|
08-16-2014
|
41 |
Ol' West LAT
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 32
|
Take into account that although the Hobby Lobby v Sebelius case sprung up questions between religion and government, their arguments weren't even valid to begin with. Their first argument was that although the Affordable Care Act permitted them to choose not to provide insurance, they were being taxed " applied financial burden" and doing so harming the company. That was a joke, their numbers showed that tax was way less than what it could cost to provide each employee with full medical coverage as quoted by Justice Kagan, "you can't call something a financial burden when it in no way harms the individual(company)." Also, the Affordable Care Act also stated that should an employer deny an employee coverage, they would have to give the employee a sufficient amount of pay that would allow the individual to seek outside coverage. And even then, their numbers showed that that option was cheaper than choosing to give each employee coverage. Second, they tried pulling the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment which was automatically shut down by Justice Ginsburg. The Affordable Care Act does not address that the tax applied was a consequence of the decision to not give coverage to an individual because of their religious affiliations or decisions. They were given well detailed options that either way was the smarter choice than choosing to bring their "useless" complaint to the floor. Now I'm not saying that the question between Religion and Politics is answered through the Affordable Care act for this case or any situation. Our government contradicts itself with the Religion Clause by opening sessions with prayers and using the Holy Bible in Courts. But the argument the that Affordable Care Act hinders one's religious decision is just not valid. |
08-17-2014
|
43 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: My bed
Posts: 732
|
And,if u want equal wages, it wont happen.if u want birth control,which is not covered by hobby lobby,u will get the same as men,but have to spend it on birth control and go and buy it. it is equal wages, and,if a woman didnt get birth control and needed it,they should of saved their money to buy birth control. for example,if your a man, and u needed food,ur company doesnt give free food. u spent all ur money on a game,and u are going to die in a day unless u eat, but have to spend money for no reason,and work because no one gave u food and spent ur money on useless items. summary i couldnt really explain above..:Women who need birth control will choose to get birth control,taking money out of their wages. if a woman doesnt need birth control but still have periods,she still ends up wasting money on getting rid of periods, or birth control, so, there will never be equal wages for women and men.employers like hobby lobby,shouldnt have topay for birth control, if they could of bought it with their own money that they got in their wage. sorry if any of my information is wrong, since i know nothing of this,or rules for insurance either. |
||
08-17-2014
|
45 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: My bed
Posts: 732
|
i read every post on this thread.i just posted for fun since i have nothing else to do,since my brother deleted all my multiplayer apps except for a flash playing app called puffin. u guys are fighting because women have unequal rights,arent getting insurance for birth control,and having to spend their own money on birth control.its unfair,but since i dont believe in god,for me,we regenerate as another thing.im too lazy to type anything else for this thread so bye.. |